Modelo Teórico de Formación Investigativa en Ciencias Veterinarias, Científicos en Ciencia Animal y de la Salud desde la Teoría de la Actividad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v5i3.1251Palabras clave:
teoría de la actividad, ciclo de investigación, formación investigativa, argumentación, educación basada en competenciasResumen
La formación de veterinarios, científicos en animales y profesionales se espera que culmine en acción basada en evidencia; no obstante, el proceso de investigación a menudo se enseña como técnicas fragmentadas. Este ensayo teórico construye su propuesta mediante una revisión narrativa e integrativa de literatura sobre teoría de la actividad, educación basada en competencias, formación investigativa y argumentación académica en el campo de la educación veterinaria y de las ciencias de la salud. Este artículo organiza el ciclo en cuatro actividades: búsqueda y recopilación, análisis, síntesis y desafío. La búsqueda transforma información en fuentes; el análisis, fuentes en enunciados; la síntesis, enunciados en argumentos; y el desafío, argumentos y datos en afirmaciones mediante deducción, inducción, abducción y confrontación empírica. El articulo apoya formación longitudinal y concluye que el currículo se fortalece cuando estas actividades guían la enseñanza y el razonamiento se hace inspeccionable.
Citas
AAVMC Council on Outcomes-Based Veterinary Education, Chaney, K. P., Hodgson, J. L., Banse, H. E., Danielson, J. A., Foreman, J. H., Kedrowicz, A. A., Meekins, J. M., Read, E. K., Salisbury, S. K., Taylor, R. M., & Frost, J. S. (2024). CBVE 2.0 model 2024. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9NTV5
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642844
Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384493
Cardwell, J. M., Magnier, K., Kinnison, T., & Silva-Fletcher, A. (2017). Student experiences and perceptions of compulsory research projects: A veterinary perspective. Veterinary Record Open, 4(1), e000243. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000243
de la Colina García, P. A., de la Colina García, T., de la Colina Flores, F., Rodríguez Frausto, H., & Rodríguez Valenzuela, S. (2026). Persuasive tools as instrumented action: Synthesizing Habermasian action types with rhetoric and instrumental genesis in veterinary, animal husbandry, and health sciences education. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 11(2), 2687–2691. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1235
Dinkelman, A. L., & Viera, A. R. (2011). The role of veterinary medical librarians in teaching information literacy and evidence-based veterinary medicine. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.2.141
Eldermire, E. R. B., Fricke, S., Alpi, K. M., Davies, E., Kepsel, A. C., & Norton, H. F. (2019). Information seeking and evaluation: A multi-institutional survey of veterinary students. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.674
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Frankson, R., Hueston, W., Christian, K., Olson, D., Lee, M., Valeri, L., Hyatt, R., Annelli, J., & Rubin, C. (2016). One Health core competency domains. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, Article 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00192
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.
Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
Lee, G. S. J., Chin, Y. H., Jiang, A. A., Mg, C. H., Nistala, K. R. Y., Iyer, S. G., Lee, S. S., Chong, C. S., & Samarasekera, D. D. (2021). Teaching medical research to medical students: A systematic review. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 945–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01183-w
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Rhind, S., Shaw, D., & Pang, L. (2026). Research projects in the core curriculum: Do supervisor and student perceptions align? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0084
Rodríguez Frausto, H., de la Colina Flores, F., de la Colina García, T., & de la Colina García, P. A. (2026a). Activity theory as a pedagogical foundation for educational models. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 5(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v5i1.1139
Rodríguez Frausto, H., de la Colina Flores, F., de la Colina García, T., & de la Colina García, P. A. (2026b). Logic, rhetoric, and persuasive media as a philosophical foundation for activity-theory-oriented educational models in veterinary and animal sciences. RA Journal of Applied Research, 12(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.47191/rajar/v12i1.09
Rodríguez Frausto, H., de la Colina Flores, F., de la Colina García, T., & de la Colina García, P. A. (2026c). Persuasion in veterinary medicine: Indications, ethical boundaries, and evidence-based tools. RA Journal of Applied Research, 12(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.47191/rajar/v12i3.03
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). Vygotsky’s neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2009). Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.001
Šlapeta, J., & Ward, M. P. (2024). Embedding research and enquiry in Australian DVM curriculum. Australian Veterinary Journal, 102(7), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13334
St-Hilaire, S., Nekouei, O., Parkes, R. S. V., & Rosanowski, S. M. (2022). Active learning for an evidence-based veterinary medicine course during COVID-19. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, Article 953687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.953687
ten Cate, O. (2005). Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Medical Education, 39(12), 1176–1177 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Vinten, C. E. K., Cobb, K. A., Freeman, S. L., & Mossop, L. H. (2016). An investigation into the clinical reasoning development of veterinary students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 43(4), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0815-130R1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Federico De La Colina Flores , Heriberto Rodriguez Frausto , Tzitzi de la Colina García , Paul Alexis de la Colina García
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
ISSN: 3045-5537
